October 17th, 2008

Voting Will Cause Millions of Americans to Lose Health Insurance

For the most part, I’ve been ignoring the barrage of radio and TV commercials for Obama and McCain that have been coming with increasing frequency as we get closer to election day. They’re almost always 90% focused on bashing the opponent, and every time I listen to one of these ads it makes me dislike BOTH candidates more, because I hear bad things about one of them and I get annoyed at the other for mudslinging.

This morning, on the way to work, I heard an ad for each candidate in the course of about 5 minutes. I actually paid attention this time, because there was a nagging feeling in the back of my mind that there was a discrepancy between ads I’d recently heard from both of them.

Sure enough:

- Obama’s ad said that McCain’s plan will cause 20 million Americans to lose their health insurance coverage.

- McCain’s ad said that Obama’s plan will cause 50 million Americans to lose their health insurance coverage.

Going by the “lesser of two evils” approach, it seems like I should vote for McCain, because 30 million fewer Americans will lose their health insurance coverage. That’s a significant number, representing roughly 10% of the U.S. population!

However, I’ll still feel guilty for being somewhat responsible for that unfortunate 20 million Americans that will lose their coverage under McCain’s plan (around 6.7% of the U.S. population).

I’ve created some 10×10 grids to graphically represent the number of Americans without health insurance as of 2007 (about 15%, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities), and the numbers if McCain and Obama are both giving realistic estimates (highly unlikely) in their ads attacking each other’s health care reform plans.

The shaded regions in the grids indicate the number of Americans without health insurance in each of these cases.

~15% of Americans lacked health insurance in 2007 ~7% more Americans may lose Health Insurance if McCain is elected ~17% more Americans may lose Health Insurance if Obama is elected
15% without health insurance in 2007 22% without health insurance under McCain’s plan 32% without health insurance under Obama’s plan

Aren’t infographics fun? Ideally, there would be no shaded regions, or a candidate would offer a health care reform plan that would result in fewer shaded regions (i.e. fewer uninsured Americans).

So, how many Americans are you going to help screw out of health insurance in this election? I’d love to hear what you think about these numbers, about my infographics, or anything else you might want to share with regard to the 2008 presidential election!

February 19th, 2008

American Gladiators 02/18/2008 - notes

First of all, we were confused as to how it was a “Grand Finale”, when last week they had the top 4 men and 4 women listed as contenders to win the competition. Then, suddenly they’ve narrowed it down to 2 men and 2 women to compete in what was basically just a regular episode (no new events or anything, just more of the same) with lots of extra flash backs to earlier footage, and extra warm and fuzzy stuff like, “This is my family in my small home town. Look how everyone in the town is loving and supporting me! Look how cute my kids are! I want to win for my dead family member or the kids that look up to me as a role model!”. Fluffy.

Anyways, here are my notes from the American Gladiators 2008 Grand Finale episode from February 18. Like last time, this is not a very polished blog entry, just a bunch of notes.
I wish they would stop advertising Knight Rider *constantly*. Lacey and I were looking forward to watching that, but unfortunately didn’t record it. Luckily, they’re showing it again next week, so the Tivo’s set to record it then. We were both surprised to see that it’s a movie, though. When they first advertised it, during one of the early American Gladiators episodes, we thought it was going to be a series.

Women contenders: Monica and Shanay
Shanay should have been disqualified for kneeling down the whole time in Joust. She did that last time as well. Not fair.
Evan vs Titan in Joust: 2 hits and Evan was in the water.
Alex vs Titan in Joust: holy crap, Hulk said there’s a huge size difference up there and he’s not kidding! Seeing them next to each other it’s like a toddler next to his father.
Titan kneeled down both times, and he had some serious pushing power behind his push.
Pyramid: announcer said “Both contenders were completely dominated […] Monica spent more time on her back than on her feet”
Toa: “My volcano, my volcano!”
Mayhem: “Now what, I’m king tut, yeah!”
The Wall:
Monica started out quick, and made it up for 10, despite some resistance from Siren near the top.
Shanay kept up pretty well, and ended up getting 5 points for hanging on up near the top when Venom was pulling on her foot
Evan: This guy is like a spider monkey. Ridiculously fast climber. 10 points, well deserved.
Militia tried to pull Alex down but couldn’t. pulled something off his shoe though.
Alex made it up for 5 points.
Ugh, there’s the Subway Replay. I kept wondering when that was coming. They kept using the words “Fueled up” throughout the episode, so I kept expecting the annoying “Fueled up and powered on by Subway” thing.
Evan has a 19 point lead over Alex going into the Eliminator. 9.5 second head start. Evan had the fastest time in Eliminator all season so far, so that 9.5 seconds might seal the deal for him.
announcer: “Both these contenders have performed beautifully throughout this competition” [hmm. you mean all TWO episodes??]
Evan breaks his previous Eliminator record time.. 1:19ish? Something like that.
Alex backflipped off the platform onto the mats at the end. We were kinda rooting for him because he’s a school teacher setting a good example for students, and trying to earn money for the wrestling team he coaches. Also because he’s kinda goofy, and that’s endearing. :)
Sounded like he said “I’d like to thank everyone for turning me on” but he said “cheering me on”.
After fast forwarding through the commercials, the first sentence I heard sounded like “penis was all hard” but really it said “Venus was all heart” or something.
Monica’s 3.5 second lead going into the Eliminator barely got her up the first wall.
Did Shanay belly flop into the flaming pool? definitely made a long splash and took longer than she should have to
30 foot cargo net climb - Shanay caught up.
Both fell off hand bike right away–good plan.
Monica barely made it to the top of the Travelator, but she did. We were glad–she was our pick for the women in this finale.
Her husband jumped down onto her when she was laying on the mats after the Eliminator. her daughters hopped on too.

So, Evan and Monica each won $100,000, a Toyota Sequoia, and they will join the ranks of the gladiators next season.
Have you seen how HUGE and muscular the existing team of gladiators is? These two had better start seriously hitting the HGH gym if they’re going to be gladiators next season!

Lacey pointed out that they should definitely have Evan do the rock wall, though. The contenders won’t stand a chance!

January 29th, 2008

American Gladiators 01/28/2008 - notes

Okay, this entry isn’t going to be the carefully worded and illustrated type that I usually strive for. I took some notes while watching American Gladiators last night, and am sharing them in raw form. It pains me to do that, though, because I’m an obsessive proofreader and prefer to edit the hell out of my blog entries before posting them. I don’t have time to clean it up today, though, and this is one of those time-sensitive posts that’s kind of pointless to read a week/month/year later, so I just want to get it out there now. I’ll probably end up editing it at some point in the future, just because it’ll bug me. :)
 
alex (wrestler, history teacher, etc, trying to raise money to get his wrestling team out of debt)
mark (chiropractor, new dad soon)
good to see people trying to throw balls instead of always dropping them in up close. worked well for men, but tony threw some as she was about to get tackled..
alex vs wolf in hang tough.. ended with sex invitation, wolf accepted it.
wolf against mark on rings: “i missed my first meal.. i don’t miss 2 in a row”.. “bye bye mark. it’s time to go [down?]”… afterwards: “i’m still hungry, bring me another one”
Lacey and I both like him better than we did at first. the howl doesn’t work, but his personality is fun to watch.
tony (46yr old.. competed 12 years ago in the original american gladiator, many years in military) .. fury
she did great on “hang tough” (rings), held on, “survived for 5″ while gladiator was pulling her down. she boasted earlier about her pullup skills, and her arm strength kept her alive there.
kim (cute little cheerleader)
tony in artillery thingy vs hellga.. got further than anyone so far.. very close, especially with crossbow. hellga having some trouble with her weapon..
kim fired the crossbow too. both ran out of time.
joust: siren vs kim.. siren had “2 knees on the platform”, so kim won pretty quick. good thing for her, because she didn’t look as stable on her feet as some people do.
militia is back.
Lacey thought that wasn’t fair, because the players don’t get disqualified for having both knees down on the platform.
alex running across the bridge really fast and well. last second, just made it for 14 points, record-setting..
mark very slow and cautious.
Lacey said: “he’s freaked out about getting hit.. avoiding at all costs.. it’s kind of a problem and makes him really baby like.”
8 points.
the girls will have the rapid whistle blowing for their start times on eliminator.. tweet, tweet.. silly half second “head start” for tony. i bet ref has to practice the timing to get the half second whistle right.
winner gets money, toyota sequoia, and right to be “a new american gladiator”.. aren’t the enemies in this called gladiators though? does that mean the winning player joins the ranks of Wolf, Siren, Toa, Hellga, etc.? Or are the gladiators just called “Gladiators”, and the winning player will be called an “American Gladatior”?

kim couldn’t get up the first wall in eliminator..  “oh my goodness”. .”this is a beat the clock competition for tony”… kim struggles
oldest contender.. 46 year old tony..
wow, they turned off the travelator for kim at the end. how embarassing.
alex: “50% of the time, i’ll win all the time” .. huh??
Lacey said: “he teaches kids.. that’s scarier than me teaching kids.”
mark looked like he was jumping on the fire.
alex hang bike made it all the way across. wow they both made it all the way across.
alex made good time. knocked out moli from the final 8.

One thing that keeps bugging me is the “Subway instant replay” or whatever. I hate how it ends with them saying “Fueled up and powered on by Subway”. It was especially annoying to me when they did that after showing a girl (a couple weeks ago) who had gotten herself in good shape with lifestyle changes.. the Subway replay thing sounded like them trying to take credit for her health/fitness, like another Jared or something. But really, who knows if any of these people actually ever eat Subway. It’s misleading advertising, IMHO. Just because the instant replay is sponsored by Subway, doesn’t make the contenders “fueled up and powered on by Subway”.
 

July 26th, 2007

Taste of Teeter invitation

We recently had a new Harris Teeter grocery store open near us, and they sent us an invitation to a special promotional event. The promo was nothing to get excited about. It was something along the lines of, “Take 10-15% off of 6 bottles of wine, on June 26 between 12-6pm!”

This was a really lame promo for several reasons:

  1. Most grocery stores around here already give you a 10% discount when you buy 6 bottles of wine in one visit.
  2. The prices of wine are generally marked up so much at grocery stores, that a 10-15% discount only brings the price down to a normal sale price.
  3. The time window to get the discount was extraordinarily small (6 hours!).
  4. The quantity required to get the discount was too large (6 bottles).

The promo excludes what I assume to be the majority of households. Not everybody drinks. But, among those that do, not everybody drinks wine. But, among those who do, not everybody would want to hurry in to buy 6 bottles! I would think that a very small percentage of households would actually care about this type of promo.

The only good thing about this promo was the name: “Taste of Teeter”. You just can’t beat that!

Taste of Teeter

July 18th, 2007

Create your own pedophile bait!

We received an ad in the mail, recently, which immediately disturbed Lacey and I. It’s a service that lets you create real, usable postage stamps with a picture of your choice. Sounds kinda cool, right? But take a look at the ad, and see if you can find what’s wrong with this picture:

small picture of photostamps ad


It seems like a cool concept, at first, to put whatever picture you want (as long as it’s yours/legal/etc) on stamps. But this ad is proudly showing a picture of a cute little kid, on a stamp. That would be cool if you’re just sending mail to your friends and family, and nobody was going to handle that mail in between.

But the reality is that several people are going to handle each piece of mail, and you’re probably going to send some to billers/rebate warehouses/misc. companies as well, and multiple people will probably handle the mail within those companies. If any of those people happens to like little kids, in a NAMBLA sort of way, then you’ve just given them your cute kid’s home address via the return address on the other corner of the envelope.

In other words, you’re announcing, “Hey, pedophiles! Here’s a picture of my cute kid, and here’s where to come get him/her!”

I remember Lacey talking about some online moms’ group forums where there was some controversy, a while back, when people posted their addresses (for swaps/co-ops/etc) publicly and had cute pics of their kids in their signature blocks. These stamps aren’t quite as bad, I think, because at least their exposure is limited to a few people handling snail mail, whereas the online message boards are googleable.

But, still, stamps.com might want to consider this before enabling proud, naïve parents to advertise their children this way. Art would be fine. Maybe even the family pet. But not children.